Archive for January, 2008

This is the first in an occasional series of examining the readily available AMM bootlegs. I intend to go through these in chronological order so this would of course be the earliest one that I have,

AMM – Royal College of Art(3), London 23 March 1966

This is the earliest AMM that one can hear, recorded about four months before AMMMusic.  At this time the lineup would have been Keith Rowe, Edwin Prévost, Lou Gare, Lawrence Sheaff and Cornelius Cardew. The recording begins with this dry bowed cello, almost random sounding plinked piano notes, small interjections of percussion and various noises generated by extended techniques. An interesting sound, the super dry cello is akin to later Feldman practices or sounds favored by Wandelweiser collective. The piano is real spare often quiet but sometimes interjection a sharp note. Not Feldman-esque, a much more sound oriented approach.  This goes on for some time, forming a sense of stasis from the continually bowed cello (though not droning on one note it should be stated) and generating an almost an uneasy feeling. This feeling is somewhat justified as the next section of the performance is radio or tape played at huge volumes. This is clearly an example of the “sheets of sound” that the group would try to surmount

“At the very first sessions of AMM I used pre-recorded tapes of Beach Boys, things like that, played enormously loud. It was our version of the “sheets of sound”. We would play it as loud as we possibly could and try to climb over it like a wall. It was a barrier to get through.” – Keith Rowe, from an interview by Dan Warburton

This goes on for some time and there seems to be several songs played simultaneously. During this Prévost heroically tries to climb that wall with a frenetic assault on the snare. This also goes on for a long time, which I think is part of the AMM aesthetic – things aren’t written off immediately as “not working” they are pushed through. Things rise to an extreme level during this as the tape and a radio announcer compete with the drum and Gare absolutely wailing on his sax. This is the apex of the session, at least as far as volume and density occurs. Eventually the outside music is worked out, the drums begin to break away and the sax (and another reed instrument most likey Sheaff on clarinet) becoming increasingly distant.

This begins the third “movement” of the performance. More spare with this dueling wind instruments and increasing silences. Out of these spaces single notes from the piano return and repeated phrases from the winds. During this section  there are two obvious stoppages of the tape and it is of course unknown what could have happened at those points. Probably either continuing as things were or long spaces that the recorder felt wasn’t worth “wasting” tape on. This section is quite interesting; it is made up of disconnected sounds, lots of spaces some of them fairly long and there feeling is that of the later trio AMM but with much more of an experimental nature. It has that tense anticipation, but a little less continuity of sound and of course a wider range of sounds.  Things begin to build up again and we enter a fourth phase of the performance. Density especially increases with electronic wailing, drums, mechanical percussion and long wails of sounds from the horns. Things are building up to nearly as high a level of density as the recorded “sheets of sounds” when the tape abruptly ends.

This is I think one of the most interesting of all of the available bootlegs. It is the earliest AMM and it demonstrates quite handily how far out they were as early as 1966.  It demonstrates to me all of the salient features of AMM music that is found in all of the stages of AMM. It is a working with sounds or noises as tools but never as an end to itself. It has that weightlessness in parts that the trio AMM so excelled at and it had the experimental nature of the composed music of the day (Cage, Tudor, Feldman, Cardew et al). Honestly it is amazing that these shows were recorded at this point. Someone had to have a reel-to-reel recorder there and be willing to spare tape. Perhaps they were recording it for their own use but we should be thankful that they were recorded at all.

Additional (11.04.09):

There is another bootleg floating around the ‘nets that appears to be a different version of this source.  This source is labeled:

AMM – ICA London 23.03.66

This actually is two performances mislabeled and is mentioned here to try to minimize confusion. This recording is divided into 7 parts of which only part 1 is part of e 03.23.66 performance. It is in fact the  last 13 minute of that recording. Parts 2-7 are from a totally different recording: 12.16.69.  These do seem to be a different recordings or perhaps some mastering was done to them as they don’t sound quite the same as the other sources. Most likely they were put onto a tape from the original source which was flipped and the second side was the end of one recording and the beginning of the next. When transfered the first side was not included for some reason. However it came about it is a misleading and inferior source and should be disregarded in favor of the other available source.


1) The AMM page at the European Free Improvisation Home
2) Keith Rowe interview by Dan Warburton at Paris Transatlantic
3) British Library Sound Archive

King of Denmark Score
King of Denmark score (first page)
from Aspen Magazine no 5/6 on UbuWeb

January, 11 2008
Dale Speicher, Music for Solo Percussion
Chapel Performance Space at the Good Shepherd Center, Seattle WA
The beginning of this year is looking particularly good for music in the Pacific Northwest. Feldman at SAM, Lachenmann in Vancouver, the massive SIMF and so on. It is particularly a good year for new composed music as there has been somewhat a drought of modern composition here. The cavalcade of great music began with a solo percussion night at the Chapel performance space. I’d seen Dale Speicher in a few ensembles in the past but this night of music brought him squarely into the limelight. I went based on the strength of the pieces that were being played by some of my favorite composers: Feldman, Wolff, Xenakis and Ashley. The three other pieces were by composers I was unaware of and one of them only a couple years old. So I chance to see new music as well as some old favorites live was not to be missed.
The stage of the chapel had several percussion “stations” scattered around it, plus a collection of percussive objects right among the front row of the chairs. A vibraphone, gongs, hand drums, a huge red-white-n-blue bass drum, various cymbals, triangles and objects were among the large collection of percussive tools on stage.  A little leary of being right in front of one of these stations as sat in the second row. Not too long afterwards the lights dimmed and the show began.

Links No. 1 (1974) Stuart Saunders Smith
Basic 10 (1987) Robert Ashley
Delusions of Grandeur (1975) Charles Lipp
King of Denmark (1964) Morton Feldman

The first piece was one I was unfamiliar with by a composer I was also unfamiliar with. The first of a series of eleven percussion pieces this one was for solo vibraphone. A nice piece that utilized the shimmering tones of the vibraphone well and seemed to mostly rely on the sweet harmonic possibilities of this instrument. It rather reminded me of wind chimes mixed with the piano noodling of Mister Rogers. I don’t recall much dissonance and overall I found it a little saccharine. Next up was Ashley’s Basic 10, a piece I was not familiar with from a composer that I am fairly familiar with. Dale moved to the far right edge of the stage and picked up a single snare drum. He began tapping this with his fingers as he walked around the stage. Usually a pattern of four fingers individually then a more resounding downbeat. He slowly made his way to a chair in the center front of the stage where he sat down and continued playing with his fingers. He’d turn the snare wires on and off, rotate the drum on it’s side all the while tapping away. The piece ended with the same pattern repeated on his chest.  Again Charles Lipp is a composer, whom though being active for a number of years, was one I was unfamiliar with. This piece used the vibraphone and several smaller drums primarily as well as some other percussive elements. It seemed to rather switch between instruments, at least at first, beginning with the vibes and then a set of mounted hand drums. Toward the end there was some overlapping sounds between these but it mostly seemed to be one thing after another. Not too memorable a piece, or perhaps just overshadowed by the final one.

The final piece was the King of Denmark by Morton Feldman, which along with the Wolff piece I was most excited to see performed live. I have recently been listening to the Max Neuhaus, The New York School cd so I had heard this piece several times in recent weeks. In order to play it, Dale first moved the bulk of his percussion arsenal to the station in the audience. The vibes, the hand drums, a xylophone and a set of bells and triangles were all mounted in a tight circle around a space where Dale stood. He told us a story of performing this at a living room concert which was his impetuous for doing this as close as he could to the audience. The piece, the only percussion one that Feldman wrote, is for a number of percussion instruments all played by hand. As Dale states in the liner notes: “In many ways the King of Denmark is an anti-percussion piece. It is to be played very softly using only the hand and fingers – no sticks or mallets.” He began by tapping a glass bottle and other objects; little bells, the triangle before moving on to drums, the vibes and occasionally the gong. Little sounds, twinkling out of the space, the very faint hum of traffic and rustling of the audience as a backdrop.  The dynamics were uniformly low, as called for by the score, but of course there would be the occasional slip or miscalculation and sound would rise above the normal levels to stunning effect. In a way it reminded me of Cage’s Atlas Eclipticalis with these little sounds coming out of space and overlapping and colliding in seemingly random, but satisfying ways. The performance was gorgeous and could have gone on twice as long as far as I was concerned.


A Slightly Evil Machine (2005) James Romig
Pairs (1968) Christian Wolff
Rebonds Part A (1987/8) Iannis Xenakis

There was a short intermission (during which I took a look at the King of Denmark score a bit of which is reproduced above) during which Dale reorganized the stage a bit. There was now three stations, the big bass drum with five other drums descending in size from right to left, on of the center of the stage was the vibes and then on the right a set of african drums and wood box of unknown objects. The show began with another new to me piece one from only a couple of years ago. Appropriate to the title the piece sounded like a machine that had something off-kilter about it. There was this constant rhythm of hitting a wood block (perhaps) and the drums but it was constantly subverting itself in an almost sickening kind of way. It takes advantage of our expectations in how something rhythmically works and by subverting that is almost disorienting. The next piece was the other one I’d been highly anticipating and it was the only one that wasn’t solo percussion. This piece is for 2,4,6 or 8 players and is one of the Wolff score’s with these disconnected little modules that the players work through in (IIRC) an indeterminate fashion. Dale was center stage with a clarinetist, on the far right was bass clarinet,  and double bass on the far left was a french horn and guitar. I love Wolff’s music and this piece had those features I so often associate it with it – these little passages fading in and out amongst gaps of varying lengths, almost random seeming harmonies and disharmonies, complex and simple at the same time. The wide separation of the players really worked to great effect in this piece I think it really made the sounds come from all around the sound stage. If you didn’t look at the players as you listened it almost was like listening on headphones so separated were the sounds. The final piece was again for solo percussion and Dale cleared the stage and finally went to that All-American Bass drum that had dominated the stage like a refugee from a Souza event.  This Xenakis piece began slowly, with a a pattern of hitting the bass drum and then two or three smaller drums. It slowly built up to greater and greater density till it became quite a tour-de-force of playing. Definitely the most energetic and dense piece of the program it was a good way to conclude the evening. Symmetrically the piece slowed down and ended as it began and this concluded our evenings program.

A real fine evening of music and I have to say I was impressed by Dale’s performance. As I said at the beginning I’d only seen him a couple of times before in ensembles so really I was pretty unaware of him. He played brilliantly and he selection of programs was right up my alley. Perfect music to for the acoustic space of the Chapel. I’ll definitely be keeping my eye on Dale’s upcoming activities. You can hear a bit of his playing and keep up on his activities yourself on his myspace page.

Three Interesting Scores by Christian Wolff
“Notation is before the fact; incentives and suggestions for action; is, by definition, incomplete, full of omissions; but, I think, should be as practical as possible. I have wanted to be practical about making it possible for musical action, performance, to be direct, each time as though for the first time; and direct too in the sense of moving outward, so that the play is not so much an expression of the player (or composer) as a way of connecting, making a community (the music itself sometimes involving internally those fluid and precise, and transparent, line or projections of connection).”
– Christian Wolff1


In 2007 with the Seattle Improv Meeting, a group focused on structured improv, I explored three scores by Christian Wolff. Christian Wolff was the youngest member of the New York School (and the only currently surviving member) and began his compositional career with very simple, spare scores sometimes using only a handful of notes. A key member of the New York school he followed and led the School in various techniques and solutions. He always was pushing the limits of notation, mutating the meanings of common terms and working to incorporate aspects of improvisation and indeterminacy. In the 60’s after meeting more politically active composers such as Cardew and Rzewlski he began to incorporate political awareness into his work.

“To turn the making of music into a collaborative and transforming activity (performer into composer into listener into composer into performer, etc.), the cooperative character of the activity to the exact source of the music. To stir up, through the production of the music, a sense of social conditions in which we live and of how these might be changed.”
– Christian Wolff4


As that quote points towards part of this political awareness was the breaking down of the barriers between performers and audience and composer and interpretor. This concern was addressed in his semi-graphic score EdgesIII, with it’s lack of instrumentation, reduced musical notation and textual instructions. But for his Prose CollectionV,  this was the primary concern; to compose works that could be played by anyone regardless of any sort of training:

Stones and Sticks, along with the other pieces in the Prose Collection were written for use by non-professional players as well as non-musicians, people, people with an interest in music, especially experimental music, strong enough to make them want to try playing some.” – Christian Wolff5

It is these types of pieces that we have particularly been interested in playing in the Seattle Improv Meeting. Like Cornelius Cardew‘s Scratch Orchestra, this group was assembled from trained and untrained musicians all that, as Wolff put it, have “an interesting in music, especially experimental music, strong enough to make them want to try playing some”.  Works that border on improvisation, where the composer has provided some structure has been the particular focus. Working with the scores of Christian Wolff this year has been especially rewarding, leading to some of the greatest challenges in interpretation as well as some of the most satisfying results.

For the rest of this post I examine the three scores that we have tackled and some of the reactions, obstacles and revelations that came from playing them. For each score I have linked to the recordings of our attempts at them, but of course with this kind of music there is near infinite variety in the realizations. In that end I also reference the other recordings I know of for each score without comment. No realization should be considered definitive. All of these scores are readily available, see the references section at the end of this post for information on attaining a copy. The Prose Scores are available for download and by merely gathering sticks or stones you can make your own realization. Post links to these in the comments!

Stones (1968-1971)

Make sounds with stones, draw sounds out of stones, using a number of sizes and kinds (and colours); for the most part discretely; sometimes in rapid sequences. For the most part striking stones with stones, but also stones on other surfaces (inside the open head of a drum, for instance) or other than struck (bowed, for instance, or amplified). Do not anything.
– Christian Wolff2


Stones was my first encounter with Christian Wolff’s Prose Scores which I heard on the Wandelweiser Composers Ensemble recording of the piece. The liner notes for the recording included the entire score (reproduced above) which on seeing I immediately desired to tackled it with the Improv Meeting. On several visits to Whidbey and Fidalgo Islands (where I spent my childhood) I gathered a nice collections of sea stones. However we wouldn’t play it for nearly nine months as I was hoping to perform it when all four members of the group were present. Eventually my increasing fascination with Wolff’s music and scores got the better of me and in 2007 gave in and performed it with the reduced group. Later on in an outdoor session we did finally play this piece with the entire group, though we segued from it into a more free improvisation.

There are several things one should note immediately with regards to this score; first off the instructions are pretty opened ended and allows for a lot of activities. But it does instruct that the playing should befor the most part discreet and that it should be made of stones on stones. With those two restrictions you are open to do what you want. When performing the score you quickly find that there are a lot of sounds you can eke out of stones from rubbing them together, rattling small ones in your hands, tapping multiple ones together and so on. When you then add the occasional outside object or technique you are rewarded with a sound perhaps outside of the range that you have been hearing. Of course those for the most parts are important – if you spent the entire time using the stones to play your guitar you’d be violating the score. Likewise if you tossed them in a rock tumbler and let it run for an hour. The sounds are mostly supposed to be that of stone on stone separated enough in time to allow them to be heard. At the same time I think if you don’t stray from the two basic rules at least a little bit then you also aren’t in the spirit of the score. But it is more forgivable in that direction.

Recordings of Stones:

Download the Seattle Improv Meeting recording: Stones

Download the Seattle Improv Meeting outdoors version:  Stones/Improv

Also available on the following recordings:
Stones(Wandelweiser Composers Ensemble)released by Timescraper
YouTube videos:
Anton Lukoszevieze at Zeitkratzer ” Unprotected Music”, April 2007: Stones I, Stones II

Sticks (1968-1971)

Make sounds with sticks of various kinds, one stick alone, several together, on other instruments, sustained as well as short. Don€™t mutilate trees or shrubbery; don€™t break anything other than the sticks; avoid outright fires unless they serve a practical purpose.

You can begin when you have not heard a sound from a stick for a while; two or three can begin together. You may end when your sticks or one of them are broken small enough that a handful of the pieces in your hands cupped over each other are not, if shaken and unamplified, audible beyond your immediate vicinity. Or hum continuously on a low note; having started proceed with other sounds simultaneously (but not necessarily continuously); when you can hum no longer, continue with other sounds, then stop. With several players either only one should do this or two or two pairs together (on different notes) and any number individually.

You can also do without sticks but play the sounds and feelings you imagine a performance with sticks would have.
-Christian Wolff3

After our successful take on Stones I was compelled to tackle Sticks. Sticks had a bit more complicated score (reproduced above) then stone, though at it’s core it isn’t too different. Wolff does include a lot more detailed instructions for how the score should conclude which includes the option beyond sticks of humming. Most interestingly is the addendum  You can also do without sticks but play the sounds and feelings you imagine a performance with sticks would have. With this instruction you could take an orchestra, or rock band and perform this score. Also worth noting is that the restriction placed on the stones of performing certain actions, most of the time, is removed. In this score you apparently can play rapid sequences or on other instruments for a greater amount of time. Though he does state sustained as well as short, which seems to imply not doing one thing the entire time. A good rule to follow in general I think. During my preliminary research for performing this score I found no other recordings of the piece. While informed by our performance of Stones, as well as the one recording I had of that, we were somewhat on our own here.

I gathered up a selection of sticks from my backyard, the local park and my place of work on the day of this performance. I also gathered a lot of pine cones figuring they were stick-like enough or at least would fall under the other instruments clause. Like the stones the variety of sounds that you can produce by the sticks is incredibly varied. Stick like of course but what with breaking them, rubbing them together, whip in the air, beating them together, running them against  a series of other sticks, twisting them against each other and so on there was a lot of different sounds available. Some of my sticks was dried bamboo and that provided the option to blow into the hollows space, to crush them, rattle other sticks inside and on and on. Of course there was the option of the other instruments and in my friends practice room there were percussion, strings and other instruments to apply this to. With the directions on how to end the piece I think that this one took more to wind down. There was some humming from at least one of use, but basically it just got sparse and sparser. Overall this was as intuitive and as dynamic to perform as Stones and I think Wolff’s simple directions pushed this beyond mere screwing around with sticks. A good exercise I think would be to perform the two scores simultaneously.

Recordings  of Sticks

Download the Seattle Improv Meeting recording: Sticks

I am unaware of any other recordings of this piece.

Edges (1968)

Edges Score, Christian Wolff

The year before Wolff began work on the Prose Scores he created the graphic score, EdgesIV. Wolff wrote this score while in London and it was originally performed by the members of AMM plus Wolff and Rzewski6. It was performed by as Wolff puts it “drop-outs from conventional music careers” whom then went on to form the basis of the Scratch Orchestra6. Edges is a sparse score of various symbols place in space. The performance score can be seen above, but it also contains a legend for the symbols and a set of textual instructions.

“”The idea of the piece and its basic performing instructions are this: the notations on the score are not so much playing instructions as such as reference points, that is, you play around it, at varying distances from the state of being intricate, and you can, but only once in a performance, imply play “intricate”. The general notion I had was of the score’s something like a photographic negative the developed picture of which would be realized by the player; or, to use another analogy, the playing would be like movement, dancing say, in a space containing a number of variously shaped but transparent and invisible objects which the dancing generally avoids, but which as the dancing kept on would become evident, visible so to speak, because they are always being danced around.”
-Christian Wollf7


I consider Edges one of the most difficult scores that our group has tackled, difficult in wrapping ones head around it primarily. As that quote above implies, the score is like instructions on how to play something else, as if there was an existing sound and you are accenting it, or making it audible through your playing. Of course one can just methodically go through the score as if it was a list of sound events to play and I think that in our first attempt at it that is more or less the tact taken. Some good sounds and interactions come from it but it seemed lacking in its realization. The second attempt, informed by the first, was a step or two closer I feel. There was more of an awareness of the tools at hand to carve our the invisible objects and that helped. We weren’t so much feeling our way in the dark as more confidently wielding these tools in service of the unrealized music. Still I think that it will take a long time to be comfortable with the score and it is something that we should revisit more frequently. The simple elegance of this score underlies its massive potential and I think in performance that makes it seem impenetrable at first. This all I think stands as testament to how well constructed it is and the realization of Wolff’s goals. “The piece is not quite improvisation, but experience with improvisation is very useful in performing it.”7. A perfect piece for this group.

Recordings  of Edges:

Seattle Improv Meeting recordings of Edges:

Download:  Edges realization 1

Download: Edges realization 2

Also available on the following recordings:
Earle Brown, John Cage und Christian Wolff released by EMI Electrola
Bread & Roses (M. Goldstein, M. Kaul) released by Wergo
New York School 3 (Kleeb, Dahinden, Polisoidis) released by HatART
Goodbye 20th Century (Sonic Youth, W. Winant, J. O’Rourke, T. Kosugi, C. Marclay, C. Wolff) released by SYR
On YouTube: Edges (though a pretty dreadful interpretation)

Christian Wolff has become a favorite composer of mine in the last few years and I have greatly enjoyed performing these accessible and open ended works of his. I highly recommend seeking out the various recordings of his music and listening to these pieces as performed by others and perhaps even more so his through composed works. Additionally his book Cues (I), is an incredibly informative read and well worth reading by musicians and fans of this area of music alike. Wolff’s writing style is very clear and he is quite good at explaining complicated subject matter at multiple levels of detail. Additionally he lived though an incredibly interesting period of musical history and was a key player in it. He has an uncanny ability to talk about the events surrounding and including him at just the right level of detachment.


Cues:  Writings & Conversations, Christian Wolff, Edition MusikText 005, 1998 Koln
II:  Christian Wolff at Wikipedia
III:  Christian Wolff pages: bio, works, recordings
IV: Edges, C.F. Peters , Photoprint edition from Sheetmusic Plus.
V: Prose Collection, Republished in (I) free PDF available from Frog Peak Music

1: Christian Wolff,  Before the Fact (I)
2: Christian Wolff, Sticks, Prose Collection 1968-71 (V, I)
3: Christian Wolff, Stones, Prose Collection 1968-71 (V, I)
4: Christian Wolff Wikipedia (II)
: Christian Wolff, Revolutionary Noise, (I, p. 200)
6: Christian Wolff, Revolutionary Noise, (I, p. 207)
7: Christian Wolff, Revolutionary Noise, (I, p. 208)